Posts Tagged ‘political humor’

Hi-Larious Obamaisms!

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

In this new segment, we collect the glory of President Obama’s crazy oratory stumbles and malapropisms! Hey, Bush, we miss ya but Obama’s taken the baton pretty well!!!

The first one!

Today Obama gave a news conference regarding the pending vote in the Senate for his stimulus package. Check out what he said!

“…and we learned that, last week, the number of unemployment claims jumped 600– um jumped to 626,000…”

Ha! Ha! Ha! At first, he said that the unemployement claims jumped, not that they jumped to! What did they jump, Mr. President? 12 buses like Evel Knievel did?? HA! HA!

And, at first, Obama said, 600! Yeah, uh, I think the unemployment claims are a tad above 600 there, Einstein! HA! Ha! (However, you did correct yourself immediately.) Ha! HA!

Here’s another one!

“We’re not going to get relief by turning back to the very same policies that, for the last eight years, doubled the national debt and threw our economy into a tailspin. We can’t embrace the losing formula that says only tax cuts will work for every problem we face, that ignores critical challenges like our addiction to foreign oil, or the soaring cost of health care, or failing schools and crumbling bridges and roads and levees. I don’t care whether you’re driving a hybrid or an SUV — if you’re headed for a cliff, you’ve got to change direction.”

Uh…Some SUVs are hybrids, genius! Oh my god! And THIS is our president!?!? HA! HA! LOL!

Obama

Our president. Mr. Articulate…Yeah, right!

Part 5 (V) of “Trevor Dash: Some Sort of Special Agent”!

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

OMG! Trevor Dash Series! Episode IIII!

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Bailey McAdams Speaks Up on California’s Prop 8

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

Our conservative columnist Bailey McAdams is back on TheDirk to give some straight talk to the American people:

bailey mcadams.jpg

Well, this Tuesday, voters across this great land will be going to the polls and electing our next president of the United States. And every one of them should get a sticker as they hand in their ballot. This sticker says, “I Voted.”

But imagine if that sticker said, “I Voted…For Gay Marriage.” How would it feel to wear that on your lapel? Or how about over your mouth and nose, so you couldn’t breathe? Or what if you wore it sort of lodged into your eye. You wouldn’t want that, right? So, if you wouldn’t wear a sticker that said you voted for gay marriage, that’s an indicator that you shouldn’t vote for gay marriage!

And if you California voters don’t vote YES on Proposition 8, homosexuals (including gays, gaywads, and gayrods) will continue to be able to legally marry in that state. And that ain’t some sticker (as you’ve probably guessed); that’s real.

First of all, if gay marriage continues to be legal, it would mean little California children will be taught about homosexuality in school! Think about it: Imagine, your little son or daughter sitting in the classroom, building a time machine or whatever kids do now in school, and the teacher inevitably says, “Gather around kids. We’re going to have our lesson about married couples.”

Now, if your child asks this teacher about why a man and woman live together, the teacher can obviously simply say, “Because they love each other and want to live together.” Innocent enough, and teaches the concept of love and commitment. Fine.

But, what if your little one asks why a man and a man live together? Well, what else can the teacher say but “Because they like to stroke each other’s cock and lick they balls noisily and ram it in each other hard. And put things in their anuses”? How else would they explain this crime against God? I can’t think of a tamer way. And imagine your child hearing this obscenity in their classroom! Needless to say, his/her cute little innocence would be lost forever.

So, if you vote against Prop 8, you’re right; your voting sticker won’t literally say, “I Voted…For Gay Marriage.” But it will say, “I Voted…To Destroy Children.” (Although, not literally.)

Headline – Election 2008

Friday, October 31st, 2008

headline1.jpg

CNN Discovers Existence of Green States

Atlanta, GA — During yesterday’s edition of the popular political pundit programme “The Situation Room,” CNN’s usually steady Wolf Blitzer seemed taken aback when he turned to the large electoral map of the upcoming presidential election. Viewers were most likely startled as well when they saw that Hawaii and Minnesota were colored neither red nor blue to designate preponderance of Republican or Democratic votes, respectively. The two states weren’t even purple, which would indicate a statistical tie in predicted voting results.

They had become green.

“We don’t know what the color means,” said a bemused Blitzer, if “bemused” means “confounded.” “It doesn’t mean a tight race in the state, which would be purple. And it of course doesn’t mean Republican or Democratic.”

And no one else at the 24-hour cable news network seemed yet to know what the new color represents either. “We just don’t know yet and are doing what we can to find out,” shrugged Tonya Andresen, Director of News Reporting at CNN.

The current red, blue, and purple color designations were invented by the news teams of the major television networks over the course of the last 35 years and have become considered a close-to-perfect standard by which to quickly convey election or poll results to TV audiences. However, this incident demonstrates that the system may be far from fucking perfect.

“David Brinkley actually said back in the 80s that we need to figure out what green means, but no one believed we’d have reason to know. Turns out Brinkley was right,” said Andresen.

The entrance to Kingdom CNN, the CNN-based theme park in Sarasota, FL

Elders Video! Trevor Dash: Episode III

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

Elders Presents: “Trevor Dash: Some Sort of Special Agent” Web Series!

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

This is the first episode of “Trevor Dash: Some Sort of Special Agent.” It’s a mini-series thus far, but if we become aware that people are liking it, we’ll keep it going.

Vote Republican 2008!

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Some Hitler Dialogue!

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

When Hitler Was a Young Adult

Friend: I understand you’re applying to art school! That’s great!

Hitler: Yeah, just, I really want to pursue this painting thing. I’m coming up with some great stuff whether it’s landscape, still life, you know, even some of the modernist/abstract stuff that’s happening. I’m particularly interested in experimenting more with uses of light. Evoking the warmth of sunlight through painting. I’m actually working on a satirical piece in which I show a ceiling in like a stifling business office and it’s got all these ugly industrial lamps, but, instead of the harsh cold light that they emit in reality, I paint the light coming out of them to be like sunlight and that kind of warmth, if you know what I mean. And I’d like to do a series of about 14 of those, each kind of depicting different configurations of those lamps and different offices and different levels of abstraction, you know? But just to show warmth leaking into even these harsh industrial or stuffy beaucratic or business offices. Like, how the sun pokes through even in the most isolating of circumstances. I don’t know, not to be schmaltzy, but I’m into that kind of symbol of hope and all that I guess. And I think this school I applied to has some great teachers and a wonderfully encouraging community of artists who can really help me shape these ideas, to visualize them.

F: That’s neat.

A month later:

F: Hey, I hear you didn’t get into that art school. I know you were really looking forward to going. I’m very sorry. I hope you’ll keep pursuing painting though. You will, won’t you?

H: No, I’m going to do something else.

Hitler’s hedcut from 1933 Wall Street Journal article praising the new German Chancellor

A Question Posed to the Candidates!

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

In the Democratic presidential campaign debate two nights ago in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus, the candidates were asked questions posed by the press. The one TheDirk offered was “What is 2+2?” This is what followed:

Moderator: What is 2+2?

(None of the candidates stepped forward to answer first, so the moderator pointed to Mrs. Hillary Clinton.)

Clinton: I’d be happy to answer that one. You know, one of my heroes has always been of course Frederick Douglass. You can ask Bill. I uh I know everything about him. Did you know he had kind of wild white hair? Also… But he probably answered this very question when he was just a young boy teaching himself math in the ramshackle library in his parents’ slave quarters. And he probably answered it as well as anyone could. Now, in my 35 years of service on behalf of–

Obama: But you’re avoiding the question. The American people need to know that you can be direct with them and, right now, you are not.

Moderator: Mr. Obama, could you answer the question? What is 2+2? Just real quickly.

Obama: Absolutely. But I don’t think the American people want to hear the same old answer to the same old questions. Do I have an idea of what these two numbers added together will be when I’m in office? I’m figuring that out. But I’ll surround myself with only the best and the brightest and the most inspired to join me in changing business as usual in Washington and in answering mathematical questions such as this one. One thing that Ronald Reagan was sort of smart about is–

Clinton: You want to be just like Ronald Reagan? Wow! And you think Reagan’s ideas are better than anything Democrats every thought of? And you want to lead a murderous cult of fanatics with Regan tattooed on their eyeballs?

Obama: Uh…no.

Clinton: Well, you just said you did! I mean…Ha! Ha! Ha! HA! You heard it, right, folks? Listen, I’ve been changing business as usual for 35 years. Come on! The question is what is 2+2! If we can’t answer that, what can we answer? And I can tell you the answer without the help of a bunch of bureaucrats. You know, John Brown Russwurm, I think I’m pronouncing that right, has of course always been one of my heroes. Russwurm, 1799 dash 1851, was an African-American abolitionist from Jamaica, known for his newspaper, Freedom’s Journal. The words “African-American,” “abolitionist,” and “Freedom’s Journal” all link to other articles particular to those subjects.

Moderator: If we can just get the answer.

Obama: Well, that’s really for the voters to decide. But hopefully those voters trust that the answer they think it is is actually the same one I think it is too. Definitely. I’m not afraid to say it. By the way, I’ll tell you one thing 2+2 is. It’s a lot less than the number of dollars we’re spending in the Iraq war, a war Hillary voted yes for.

Moderator: So you said that that is one thing 2+2 is. Are there other things 2+2 can be?

Obama: It can be up to as many as probably three other things.

Moderator: Ah ha! So can I assume you mean to say that 2+2 is four?

Obama: For? For what? For change in Washington or for business as usual? For continued erosion of our reputation throughout the world or for a return to when the United States was seen as a beacon of hope? Martin Luther King Jr., whose birthday we celebrate tonight, was, he was a great man and I always try to emulate him when I speak. His message of hope, his –

Clinton: He was a tremendous leader but he did need some slight amount of help to get his initiatives passed into law.

Obama: I resent that extremely racist remark.

Clinton: See, you’re using the race card to avoid the question that was asked of us. You know, one of my heroes has always been this black gentleman I don’t know the name of. And when I’m faced with a tough question such as this, I take a look in the mirror — and, by the way, it’s the type of mirror most widely used by South Carolinians, whatever that type is. There’s no other kind; it’s the best! But, anyway, I–

Moderator: 2+2, please.

Obama: Brutha! I forgot to say “brutha” in this debate so far. So there it is. I’m sorry, continue, Hillary.

Clinton: Well, I certainly will. Ha! Ha! Anyway…

Edwards: Four. The answer’s four.

(The audience applauds loudly. Clinton and Obama take note of this.)

Clinton: Four. That’s what I’ve been saying all along here. I mean ha! ha! HA! HA! HA!

Obama: I said it was four back in 2002.

debate.jpg