Bailey McAdams here, right-wing columnist for TheDirk.com.

Anyway, the Liberals fought the anti-flag-burning amendment tooth and long, prissy nail once again. Is it any wonder the economy is falling apart? What I love is that the Democrats are for burning the flag, the very symbol of the country and all it stands for, but they’re against even the mere burning of the houses of Iraqi families. Seems hypocritical to me, but, hey, no more Mr. A-hole Guy for me.

You see, I designed a flag just for the Liberals, and they can burn it all they want, so they can leave our flag alone. (Below is the official flag description.)

(1) Upon a blue field in the canton, 19 white stars, each representing one of the 19 typically Democratic-voting states. White quote marks around each to symbolize that, however, these “Democratic states” actually belong to the Republican-run country of which they are a mere part.

(2) Large amount of empty blue space (remaining after the very few Democratic states are accounted for) represents Liberals’ belief in leaving undeveloped land fallow and untouched by progress and productivity and malls.

(3) Alternating red and white stripes, the colors of which do noticeably run, represent nothing, which is most likely “cool” with Liberals.

(4) Colors of lower-half of the flag are those of the Mexican standard, symbolizing the Liberals’ firmly-held belief that illegal Mexican immigrants may enter this country at will and have the right to everything under the sun, even emergency health care.

(5) Horizontally-displayed through the center of the standard, printed the sentence “You may tread on me. Can I also offer you a joint or vegetarian jerky?” Thus representing the ideal Liberals have expressed, through their displeasure with the Iraq War of 2003-?, that terrorists should be allowed to enter our country at will and kill our children.

(6) Displayed in the lower-center of the standard, an eagle and squirrel in romantic embrace. This suggests the Liberal practice of defying the law of God to allow any kind of unnatural act such as gay marriage or long hair for men.

Click for more Bailey McAdams columns

Our resident right-wing columnist, Bailey McAdams, did not appreciate the bespectacled Stephen Colbert’s speech at the White House Correspondents Dinner. Here’s what he has to say on that.

Other McAdams columns:

The Iraq War (2004)

“Fahrenheit 911″ (2004)

The Kerry-Bush Debate (2004)

Tsunami Aid (2005)

Exactly a little over a year ago, our resident right-wing columnist, Bailey McAdams, debuted on TheDirk.com, correcting us on our views about the war in Iraq. Click up in here to take a look back at his first column!